tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19897529.post424167876094080248..comments2024-03-29T03:30:42.787-04:00Comments on A Dark Planet: The subtle and not-so-subtle art of propaganda.David Terrenoirehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09482864941636273068noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19897529.post-105130366800220112009-08-12T20:40:33.739-04:002009-08-12T20:40:33.739-04:00People agreeing with me? This can't be. Both...People agreeing with me? This can't be. Both of yous should seek counseling fast.<br /><br />Obama should be out there leading the charge (campaign all over again if he has to). He needs to get down and dirty; whatever it takes. Fuck the blue dogs and the Republicans.<br /><br />If he doesn't, he's just another suit.Charlieoperahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08876755029099726686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19897529.post-4097552282829244622009-08-12T17:47:55.514-04:002009-08-12T17:47:55.514-04:00I am as surprised as you, Dave-I agree with Charli...I am as surprised as you, Dave-I agree with Charlie, too. I've been yelling for a while now for Obama to grow a pair and throw this bipartisan bullshit in the can where it belongs.<br /><br />It is not the place of the dominant party in any arena to give ground. <br /><br />Fuck 'em. Steamroller, baby...Gary Mnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19897529.post-8428698406501871552009-08-12T16:33:44.681-04:002009-08-12T16:33:44.681-04:00Oooops, then I MUST redact ...
Seriously, he need...Oooops, then I MUST redact ...<br /><br />Seriously, he needs to either grow or show a pair with his own party and start hanging those blue dogs out to dry. I mean, WTF. Who cares if they lose their seats so long as they vote with Republicans?Charlieoperahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08876755029099726686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19897529.post-41201505563833512342009-08-12T16:26:58.553-04:002009-08-12T16:26:58.553-04:00Wow, Charlie, you and I agree.Wow, Charlie, you and I agree.David Terrenoirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09482864941636273068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19897529.post-52236652047791888072009-08-12T16:08:02.168-04:002009-08-12T16:08:02.168-04:0060 Dems v. 40 Reps = no need for bipartisanship.
...60 Dems v. 40 Reps = no need for bipartisanship.<br /><br />Steamroll that baby (healthcare reform) and please don't let them water it down so it means essentially nothing ... or deal with the consequences of coming up empty for those who voted you in (while coming up big for Wall Street, the healthcare industry, etc.).<br /><br />And get us out of those wars (which are for exactly what at this point)?<br /><br />And/or offer gays the same equal rights the rest of us have.<br /><br />Just CHANGE SOMETHING already because so far all I'm seeing is a lot of talk and very little action.<br /><br />Need funding for 46 million Americans without insurance? How about getting us out of Iraq (you know, the "wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time") sooner than 1 year before the next presidential election (or was that time frame just coincidence)?Charlieoperahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08876755029099726686noreply@blogger.com