Oh, this doesn't look good.

Thanks to Tom Tomorrow for picking this up. I think.

Here on page A17 of today's Washington Post, is this story:

U.N. INSPECTORS DISPUTE IRAN REPORT BY HOUSE PANEL
Paper on Nuclear Aims Called Dishonest

U.N. inspectors investigating Iran's nuclear program angrily complained to the Bush administration and to a Republican congressman yesterday about a recent House committee report on Iran's capabilities, calling parts of the document "outrageous and dishonest" and offering evidence to refute its central claims.

And Tom points out this story from September 18, 2002:

EVIDENCE ON IRAQ CHALLENGED
Experts Question if Tubes Were Meant for Weapons Program

A key piece of evidence in the Bush administration’s case against Iraq is being challenged in a report by independent experts who question whether thousands of high-strength aluminum tubes recently sought by Iraq were intended for a secret nuclear weapons program.

Tom finds a way to make us laugh about this bit of deja vu.

I can't.

(By the way, that's a picture of Tehran up there. I'm sure we'll all see a lot more shots from this particular POV.)